↓ Skip to main content

Patient factors affecting decision regret in the medical treatment process of gynecological diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Patient factors affecting decision regret in the medical treatment process of gynecological diseases
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0137-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyomi Tanno, Seiji Bito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,366,847
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#245
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,460
of 315,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.