↓ Skip to main content

New Method of Assessment of the Integral Fluence of Solar Energetic (> 1 GV Rigidity) Particles from Neutron Monitor Data

Overview of attention for article published in Solar Physics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
New Method of Assessment of the Integral Fluence of Solar Energetic (> 1 GV Rigidity) Particles from Neutron Monitor Data
Published in
Solar Physics, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11207-019-1485-8
Authors

Sergey A. Koldobskiy, Gennady A. Kovaltsov, Alexander L. Mishev, Ilya G. Usoskin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#11,209,252
of 14,137,193 outputs
Outputs from Solar Physics
#787
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,791
of 251,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Solar Physics
#31
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,137,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.