↓ Skip to main content

Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12984-019-0566-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uria Moran, Uri Gottlieb, Arnon Gam, Shmuel Springer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,304,258
of 13,366,323 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#142
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,584
of 209,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,366,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them