↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative shared-care for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Postoperative shared-care for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12630-019-01433-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha Mazzarello, Daniel I. McIsaac, Joshua Montroy, Dean A. Fergusson, Dalal Yateem, P. J. Devereaux, Manoj M. Lalu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,326,040
of 13,516,335 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#374
of 1,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,052
of 244,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#35
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.