↓ Skip to main content

The role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, July 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13428-019-01270-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoff Hollis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 45%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Linguistics 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#11,984,972
of 15,062,515 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,003
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,755
of 259,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#53
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,062,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.