↓ Skip to main content

Significance of automated external defibrillator in identifying lethal ventricular arrhythmias

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Significance of automated external defibrillator in identifying lethal ventricular arrhythmias
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00431-019-03421-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Tsuda, Elaine M. Geary, Joel Temple

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,825,099
of 13,434,955 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,258
of 2,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,788
of 234,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#41
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,434,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.