↓ Skip to main content

Isometric-based test improves EMG-threshold determination in boys vs. men

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Isometric-based test improves EMG-threshold determination in boys vs. men
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04185-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey Woods, Raffy Dotan, Nicole Jenicek, James Maynard, David Gabriel, Craig Tokuno, Bareket Falk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,828,261
of 13,337,884 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
#1,729
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,233
of 206,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
#33
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.