↓ Skip to main content

Towards the Design of Ethical Standards Related to Digital Mental Health and all Its Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Towards the Design of Ethical Standards Related to Digital Mental Health and all Its Applications
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40501-019-00180-0
Authors

Til Wykes, Jessica Lipshitz, Stephen M. Schueller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Psychology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,055,704
of 13,478,187 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
#12
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,145
of 243,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,478,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them