| Title |
Predicting the course of Alzheimer’s progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Informatics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40708-019-0099-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Iddi, Dan Li, Paul S. Aisen, Michael S. Rafii, Wesley K. Thompson, Michael C. Donohue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 18 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,255,201
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#17
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,382
of 350,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them