Title |
Quadriceps muscle activity during commonly used strength training exercises shortly after total knee arthroplasty: implications for home‐based exercise‐selection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40634-019-0193-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Linding Jakobsen, Markus Due Jakobsen, Lars Louis Andersen, Henrik Husted, Henrik Kehlet, Thomas Bandholm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
Switzerland | 4 | 7% |
Denmark | 3 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 73% |
Scientists | 9 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 21% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
Sports and Recreations | 17 | 13% |
Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#883,048
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#6
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,996
of 354,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them