↓ Skip to main content

Recent progress in instrumental techniques for architectural heritage materials

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Recent progress in instrumental techniques for architectural heritage materials
Published in
Heritage Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40494-019-0280-z
Authors

Chen Zhao, Yiwen Zhang, Chong-Chen Wang, Miaole Hou, Aiqun Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 14%
Engineering 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 9 9%
Chemical Engineering 5 5%
Materials Science 4 4%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,742
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#386
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,236
of 352,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.