↓ Skip to main content

Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 966)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
161 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2294-0
Authors

I. Kelman, J. C. Gaillard, James Lewis, Jessica Mercer, Kelman, I

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 20 13%
Unspecified 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 35%
Environmental Science 26 17%
Unspecified 23 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Arts and Humanities 8 5%
Other 33 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#103,434
of 12,140,114 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#3
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,946
of 285,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,140,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.