↓ Skip to main content

Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,092)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
199 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2294-0
Authors

I. Kelman, J. C. Gaillard, James Lewis, Jessica Mercer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 199 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 198 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 27%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 12%
Researcher 24 12%
Unspecified 20 10%
Other 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 67 33%
Environmental Science 35 17%
Unspecified 33 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 8%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 41 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#100,212
of 13,642,690 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#3
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,777
of 263,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,642,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.