↓ Skip to main content

Mechanics of moving defects in growing sheets: 3-d, small deformation theory

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Theory, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1021 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Mechanics of moving defects in growing sheets: 3-d, small deformation theory
Published in
Materials Theory, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41313-020-00018-w
Authors

Amit Acharya, Shankar C. Venkataramani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,021 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 250. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#151,262
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Materials Theory
#1
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,136
of 388,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them