↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Biology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies
Published in
Journal of the History of Biology, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10739-009-9206-z
Authors

Joe Cain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 36 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 39%
Arts and Humanities 9 20%
Unspecified 5 11%
Philosophy 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Other 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,547,551
of 13,243,534 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#289
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,189
of 185,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.