↓ Skip to main content

Performance characterization and analysis for Hadoop K-means iteration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cloud Computing, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Performance characterization and analysis for Hadoop K-means iteration
Published in
Journal of Cloud Computing, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13677-016-0053-0
Authors

Joseph Issa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Lecturer 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 61%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,364,458
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cloud Computing
#88
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,934
of 326,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cloud Computing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.