↓ Skip to main content

Evolving concepts for safer ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
164 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Evolving concepts for safer ventilation
Published in
Critical Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2406-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J. Marini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#137,696
of 13,226,891 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#74
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,281
of 178,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.