↓ Skip to main content

Who should decide about children’s and adolescents’ participation in health research? The views of children and adults in rural Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 563)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters
Title
Who should decide about children’s and adolescents’ participation in health research? The views of children and adults in rural Kenya
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0375-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Marsh, Nancy Mwangome, Irene Jao, Katharine Wright, Sassy Molyneux, Alun Davies

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#492,365
of 13,187,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#35
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,403
of 158,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,187,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them