↓ Skip to main content

Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: a systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 150)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: a systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1
Authors

Yeping Li, Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ke Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,193,761
of 13,127,605 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#46
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,028
of 122,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,127,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them