↓ Skip to main content

On the usability of skull maceration in fatal head injuries caused by axes

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine & Pathology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
On the usability of skull maceration in fatal head injuries caused by axes
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine & Pathology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12024-019-00129-y
Authors

Benjamin Ondruschka, Jan Dreßler, Niels Hammer, Rexson Tse, Ronny Bayer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,760,706
of 14,021,570 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine & Pathology
#245
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,091
of 258,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine & Pathology
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.