↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing ontology-driven diagnostic reasoning with a symptom-dependency-aware Naïve Bayes classifier

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Enhancing ontology-driven diagnostic reasoning with a symptom-dependency-aware Naïve Bayes classifier
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-2924-0
Authors

Ying Shen, Yaliang Li, Hai-Tao Zheng, Buzhou Tang, Min Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,103,154
of 13,226,239 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,820
of 4,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,262
of 212,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.