Title |
Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital hip Disruption (RAPID): findings from a randomised feasibility study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0454-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jenna K. Jones, Bridie A. Evans, Greg Fegan, Simon Ford, Katy Guy, Sian Jones, Leigh Keen, Ashrafunnesa Khanom, Mirella Longo, Ian Pallister, Nigel Rees, Ian T. Russell, Anne C. Seagrove, Alan Watkins, Helen A. Snooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 52% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 23% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,372,722
of 24,857,051 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#128
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,497
of 359,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,857,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.