↓ Skip to main content

Mapping landscape-scale peatland degradation using airborne lidar and multispectral data

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
Title
Mapping landscape-scale peatland degradation using airborne lidar and multispectral data
Published in
Landscape Ecology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00844-5
Authors

Donna Carless, David J. Luscombe, Naomi Gatis, Karen Anderson, Richard E. Brazier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,255,896
of 13,139,039 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#80
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,787
of 176,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,139,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.