↓ Skip to main content

The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00018-019-03150-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Prestel, Nanna Wichmann, Joao M. Martins, Riccardo Marabini, Noah Kassem, Sebastian S. Broendum, Marit Otterlei, Olaf Nielsen, Martin Willemoës, Michael Ploug, Wouter Boomsma, Birthe B. Kragelund

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor 7 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Chemistry 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 48 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,085,568
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,487
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,618
of 351,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#39
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.