↓ Skip to main content

The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00018-019-03150-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Prestel, Nanna Wichmann, Joao M. Martins, Riccardo Marabini, Noah Kassem, Sebastian S. Broendum, Marit Otterlei, Olaf Nielsen, Martin Willemoës, Michael Ploug, Wouter Boomsma, Birthe B. Kragelund

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 45%
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,092,657
of 13,976,883 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences
#2,207
of 2,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,577
of 258,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences
#42
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,976,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.