↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic analyses of human 1/2/8/20 paralogons suggest segmental duplications during animal evolution

Overview of attention for article published in 3 Biotech, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic analyses of human 1/2/8/20 paralogons suggest segmental duplications during animal evolution
Published in
3 Biotech, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13205-019-1768-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farhan Haq, Usman Saeed, Rida Khalid, Muhammad Qasim, Maryam Mehmood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,438,265
of 13,457,898 outputs
Outputs from 3 Biotech
#130
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,797
of 248,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3 Biotech
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.