↓ Skip to main content

The influence of visual field position induced by a retinal prosthesis simulator on mobility

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The influence of visual field position induced by a retinal prosthesis simulator on mobility
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00417-019-04375-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takao Endo, Kenta Hozumi, Masakazu Hirota, Hiroyuki Kanda, Takeshi Morimoto, Kohji Nishida, Takashi Fujikado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Computer Science 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,081,624
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
#228
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,628
of 366,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.