| Title |
Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40643-016-0105-9 |
| Authors |
Kartikey Kumar Gupta, Kamal Rai Aneja, Deepanshu Rana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 7 | 29% |
| Uganda | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 517 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Researcher | 43 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 10% |
| Unknown | 217 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 8% |
| Engineering | 39 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 18 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 83 | 16% |
| Unknown | 243 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#686,698
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#2
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,022
of 354,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them