↓ Skip to main content

For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
Published in
EJNMMI Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avigaëlle Sher, Franck Lacoeuille, Pacôme Fosse, Laurent Vervueren, Aurélie Cahouet-Vannier, Djamel Dabli, Francis Bouchet, Olivier Couturier

Abstract

This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. One hundred six [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) or on tumors (n = 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUVmax (hottest voxel), SUVpeak (maximum average SUV within a 1-cm(3) spherical volume), and SUVaverage were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors (SUVmax ≥ 5), the SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUV41% (isocontour threshold method) were computed. For tumors, SUVpeak values did not vary with acquisition time. SUVmax displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5-10-min reconstruction times. SUV41% was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUVaverage was the sole parameter that did not vary over time. For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUVpeak may be more robust than the SUVmax. The SUVaverage over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 36%
Physics and Astronomy 8 11%
Engineering 7 9%
Chemistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,252,924
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#207
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,424
of 298,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.