Title |
Effects of different ascorbic acid doses on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0532-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ying Wang, Huan Lin, Bing-wen Lin, Jian-dong Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 20 | 19% |
Ecuador | 7 | 7% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 5% |
Colombia | 5 | 5% |
United States | 4 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Peru | 2 | 2% |
Costa Rica | 2 | 2% |
Paraguay | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 50 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 93 | 87% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 9% |
Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 22% |
Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#632,926
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#60
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,670
of 365,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.