↓ Skip to main content

Effects of different ascorbic acid doses on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
114 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Effects of different ascorbic acid doses on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0532-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Wang, Huan Lin, Bing-wen Lin, Jian-dong Lin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Other 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 35 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#369,848
of 19,149,909 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#31
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,195
of 280,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,149,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them