| Title |
A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Honey Dressing vs. Povidone Iodine Dressing in Chronic Wound Healing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Surgery, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12262-012-0682-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Gulati, Ashia Qureshi, Anurag Srivastava, Kamal Kataria, Pratik Kumar, Acharya Balakrishna Ji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 18% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,398,689
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Surgery
#96
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,425
of 179,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Surgery
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.