↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical screening of novel electrode materials for lithium–ion batteries from industrial polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Ionics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 166)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Theoretical screening of novel electrode materials for lithium–ion batteries from industrial polymers
Published in
Ionics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11581-019-03007-3
Authors

Huili Lu, Jun Yu, Ge Chen, Shaorui Sun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,109,132
of 13,571,715 outputs
Outputs from Ionics
#5
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,109
of 251,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ionics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,571,715 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them