Title |
The 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake (MJMA = 6.7) was triggered by a strike-slip faulting in a stepover segment: insights from the aftershock distribution and the focal mechanism solution of the main shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40623-019-1032-8 |
Authors |
Kei Katsumata, Masayoshi Ichiyanagi, Mako Ohzono, Hiroshi Aoyama, Ryo Tanaka, Masamitsu Takada, Teruhiro Yamaguchi, Kazumi Okada, Hiroaki Takahashi, Shin’ichi Sakai, Satoshi Matsumoto, Tomomi Okada, Toru Matsuzawa, Shuichiro Hirano, Toshiko Terakawa, Shinichiro Horikawa, Masahiro Kosuga, Hiroshi Katao, Yoshihisa Iio, Airi Nagaoka, Noriko Tsumura, Tomotake Ueno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 21% |
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,692,145
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#413
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,527
of 364,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.