↓ Skip to main content

Pulse Arrival Time and Pulse Interval as Accurate Markers to Detect Mechanical Alternans

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Pulse Arrival Time and Pulse Interval as Accurate Markers to Detect Mechanical Alternans
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10439-019-02221-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan van Duijvenboden, Ben Hanson, Nick Child, Pier D. Lambiase, Christopher A. Rinaldi, Gill Jaswinder, Peter Taggart, Michele Orini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#10,649,901
of 13,385,708 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1,117
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,915
of 244,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,385,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.