| Title |
Impact of a computer-assisted decision support system (CDSS) on nutrition management in critically ill hematology patients: the NUTCHOCO study (nutritional care in hematology oncologic patients and critical outcome)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0527-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florence Ettori, Aurélia Henin, Christophe Zemmour, Laurent Chow-Chine, Antoine Sannini, Magali Bisbal, Frédéric Gonzalez, Luca Servan, Jean Manuel de Guibert, Marion Faucher, Jean Marie Boher, Djamel Mokart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,021,930
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#894
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,935
of 350,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.