↓ Skip to main content

Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oncology Reports, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma in Adults
Published in
Current Oncology Reports, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11912-019-0807-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ding Fang Chuang, Xuling Lin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#10,443,054
of 13,099,193 outputs
Outputs from Current Oncology Reports
#312
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,142
of 182,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oncology Reports
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,099,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.