↓ Skip to main content

Korounkorokalé revisited: ThePays Mande and the West African microlithic technocomplex

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 166)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Korounkorokalé revisited: ThePays Mande and the West African microlithic technocomplex
Published in
African Archaeological Review, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02968406
Authors

Kevin C. MacDonald

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,850,409
of 13,055,201 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#32
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,090
of 208,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,055,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them