↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between eccentric and concentric resistance exercise training without equipment for changes in muscle strength and functional fitness of older adults

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 4,388)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between eccentric and concentric resistance exercise training without equipment for changes in muscle strength and functional fitness of older adults
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04147-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiro Katsura, Noriko Takeda, Taketaka Hara, Sho Takahashi, Kazunori Nosaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 93 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 99 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 405. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#74,691
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#16
of 4,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,429
of 364,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.