↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between eccentric and concentric resistance exercise training without equipment for changes in muscle strength and functional fitness of older adults

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 4,369)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between eccentric and concentric resistance exercise training without equipment for changes in muscle strength and functional fitness of older adults
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04147-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiro Katsura, Noriko Takeda, Taketaka Hara, Sho Takahashi, Kazunori Nosaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 93 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 99 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 397. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#76,446
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#16
of 4,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,472
of 363,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.