↓ Skip to main content

Pancreatic transplantation: surgical technique, normal radiological appearances and complications

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Pancreatic transplantation: surgical technique, normal radiological appearances and complications
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13244-010-0046-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances A. Hampson, Susan J. Freeman, Julia Ertner, Martin Drage, Andrew Butler, Chris J. Watson, Ashley S. Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 26%
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,362,070
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#649
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,505
of 99,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.