↓ Skip to main content

ACOs and the 1%: Changes in Spending Among High-Cost Patients Following the Medicare Shared Savings Program

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
ACOs and the 1%: Changes in Spending Among High-Cost Patients Following the Medicare Shared Savings Program
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-04963-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam A. Markovitz, Samyukta Mullangi, John M. Hollingsworth, Ushapoorna Nuliyalu, Andrew M. Ryan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,370,952
of 13,352,827 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,928
of 4,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,221
of 250,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#70
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,352,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.