↓ Skip to main content

Add Isotropic Gaussian Kernels at Own Risk: More and More Resilient Modes in Higher Dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Add Isotropic Gaussian Kernels at Own Risk: More and More Resilient Modes in Higher Dimensions
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00454-013-9517-x
Authors

Herbert Edelsbrunner, Brittany Terese Fasy, Günter Rote

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
United States 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 55%
Mathematics 4 36%
Engineering 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#9,773,595
of 12,231,364 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#163
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,170
of 289,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,231,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.