↓ Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal—an in vitro study

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal—an in vitro study
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40510-019-0269-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyanka Shah, Padmaja Sharma, Santosh Kumar Goje, Nikita Kanzariya, Maitry Parikh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 30 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 45%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#111
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,721
of 363,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.