↓ Skip to main content

Predictive Virtual Patient Modelling of Mechanical Ventilation: Impact of Recruitment Function

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Predictive Virtual Patient Modelling of Mechanical Ventilation: Impact of Recruitment Function
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10439-019-02253-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie E. Morton, Jennifer L. Knopp, J. Geoffrey Chase, Knut Möller, Paul Docherty, Geoffrey M. Shaw, Merryn Tawhai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 23 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Computer Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 29 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1,095
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,300
of 366,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them