On the monetary measures of global liquidity
Financial Innovation, April 2019
Israr Ahmad Shah Hashmi, Arshad Ali Bhatti
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||20%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||7%|
|Student > Master||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||3||20%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.