↓ Skip to main content

Triage in public health emergencies: ethical issues

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Triage in public health emergencies: ethical issues
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11739-010-0362-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Petrini

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Researcher 4 12%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Unspecified 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 9 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,825,964
of 12,988,515 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#118
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,836
of 196,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,988,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.