| Title |
Chitosan-based composite bilayer scaffold as an in vitro osteochondral defect regeneration model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-019-0373-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariane E. Erickson, Jialu Sun, Sheeny K. Lan Levengood, Shawn Swanson, Fei-Chien Chang, Ching T. Tsao, Miqin Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,913,713
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#548
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,759
of 351,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.