@jack_turban @LisaLittman1 @jk_rowling @AllianceDefends @cjstreed @BenInLDN @JennyBoylan @ProudSocialist @MinkysHighjinks @NBCOUT @pfpicardi @arghavan_salles @mirandayaver It wasn’t a scientific study. It was a methodologically pseudoscientific mess. https
@MindfullMoms There is no such thing. The whole "sudden onset" thing is garbage science. https://t.co/FDtakQmHOi
Methodological problems with Littman's paper, which the book is based upon (I question the pathologizing argument): https://t.co/8NI6jEUF7C
@GenderCritical3 Her garbage work was still published, but the journal apologised, the peer reviews tore apart all but the raw results, and someone published an entire paper explaining why it was garbage: https://t.co/VCJaEDDMOv
@SwipeWright Free advice from someone who interviews in STEM: If you're applying for scientific job, then publicly posting debunked, blatantly biased quackery isn't going to boost your chances. https://t.co/sPpma6aswO https://t.co/NjPgSzbQwa https://t.c
@jean_squeaky @crookedbutt @madelynlisette @jk_rowling This critique is very thorough, would be interested to hear your thoughts: https://t.co/mbnG4yGkqu
@missedith01 @crookedbutt @madelynlisette @jk_rowling - Selection bias from recruiting parents from gender critical websites -Only parents surveyed, who may not have be aware of the thought process behind their child's transition (esp if they were discour
@VonAlawon @crookedbutt @madelynlisette @jk_rowling more detail here: https://t.co/mbnG4yGkqu
@bobreynolds64 @gravygravyjosh @transscribe @jk_rowling And also, funnily enough, there are 250% more paper debunking the “study” than can actually prove it. Citstion 1: https://t.co/zMc2jmee4l
@PFTroy @PixelsRed @Kat54Kitty @MrsNickyClark https://t.co/RAaN0YNj7v This is a pretty thorough critique of all the problems with methodology. Is there anything in particular you think this review has got wrong?
RT @DadTrans: Multiple peer reviewed critiques have been made of its methodology, framing, understanding of literature Some of these inclu…
RT @DadTrans: Multiple peer reviewed critiques have been made of its methodology, framing, understanding of literature Some of these inclu…
RT @DadTrans: Multiple peer reviewed critiques have been made of its methodology, framing, understanding of literature Some of these inclu…
RT @DadTrans: Multiple peer reviewed critiques have been made of its methodology, framing, understanding of literature Some of these inclu…
Multiple peer reviewed critiques have been made of its methodology, framing, understanding of literature Some of these include "Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” (Restar, 2020) 5/
@iseult @Johnny_Murtagh @SineadOCarroll @jk_rowling ...and there's a whole paper addressing the flaws: https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@rynv1x also been debunked several times in academia, see https://t.co/dQnkC7bUVP
RT @justlurking4now: Fuck TERFS in general and JK Rowling specifically: Restar, A.J. Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-…
here's some links NOT by anti-trans people where you can read more about why ROGD isn't even a good hypothesis and the evidence is flimsy at best: https://t.co/gfj1MMsNj9 https://t.co/EPdXyMv6cw https://t.co/k50jOJIJUC
@CroneInAMillion @EmmaWatson Someone blocked me after they accused me of not doing my research, so here, take a look at why the “studies” she referenced are not saying what she says. https://t.co/QaV1PVHM0a
@Skidoo @filmsonwax @LucyTheReader @littlehux The paper she's referring to was reviewed after publication as it had problems with its methodology https://t.co/skDA1WiVX3
@MarcoYololo The ROGD study? It is severely flawed Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” https://t.co/XOArAaG8GO https://t.co/vcbsHWelvJ
@ImWatson91 @Bernard_Lane A Brown University critique debunking the idea of social contagion; https://t.co/eNQ9RRbnzv
RT @supergirl_steph: For anyone out there fighting the TERF war against transphobia, here's a fantastic scientific article should y'all eve…
RT @supergirl_steph: For anyone out there fighting the TERF war against transphobia, here's a fantastic scientific article should y'all eve…
For anyone out there fighting the TERF war against transphobia, here's a fantastic scientific article should y'all ever need to debunk the ROGD myth. Spread the word and share! :) xxx
@acid_angelic @KatyMontgomerie @alexandrasaurus @Ri_Science Here's a real paper debunking ROGD. I suggest you read it. FYI, Lisa Littman, who invented the term ROGD after sampling transphobic mothers on internet forums, wrote a (now debunked) paper inven
@GabrielRossman @SometimesSoftly @RogueNotary There's also a full article methodological criticism https://t.co/4D2XfNoCGB
@Pathdom @Katja_Thieme This is the methodological critique: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc
@KirkMMaxey @SwipeWright @DiversifyEEB It isn't and it doesn't. Just ask professional medical associations, the editors of PLOS, and this author https://t.co/4D2XfNoCGB
@NakramR @rasmansa @SwipeWright @LisaLittman1 There’s methodological issues w/ Litman’s study. https://t.co/L2D0li7iZe
@itsbirdemic @SwipeWright @DiversifyEEB Here's the methodological review of said paper as well. https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc
@jessesingal @itsbirdemic For reference: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc Also, even Littman's new study is using qualitative methodology - which demonstrates correlation, not causation - so why are you claiming causation?
@arbakr See https://t.co/4D2XfNoCGB for example
@PiqueResProject We should be angry at it being done in a biased and unsound way though. It's not merely poor science - it undermines the healthcare that transitioning trans people need, and does real harm to real people. https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@ethikrat Wissenschaftler*innen zerrissen weil es unwissenschaftlich ist, genauso wie die zugrunde liegende "Littman Studie". https://t.co/6URBJqOP2c https://t.co/1c5X65g3PU
“..The article continues to pathologize gender dysphoria and affirmation of trans identification through social network peers and online environments as an example of “deviancy training”....” This article is well worth a read
This is the trouble with @bernard_lane, using the same methodology as the anti-vax’ers, throw enough stories around and someone will believe them. His entire crusade is built on one study - and it is very flawed.
@thebryanearl @SportsGossipCom @FilmFatale_NYC https://t.co/yJNIF1zPSt Another helpful article for understanding transgenderism
@PiraatPedro @RadFemme74 @AlwaysThink12 @ForeverMagdalen @DpFan24 @stereogum @ripx4nutmeg @DebbieHayton @athornehere @AllianceLGB @NoToMisogyny Omg I just read through the study and then this critique they asked *the parents* to rate their kid's dysphoria?
@AllianceLGB https://t.co/x8DgDmP38J Littmam’s ‘study’ has been thoroughly debunked. Also outside of a couple of anti trans articles in the guardian do you ever use non right wing sources for your anti trans bias? Just curious. #LGBAllianceIsAntiTrans #LGB
https://t.co/x8DgDmP38J Littman’s ‘ROGD’ study is inherently flawed (see link) and using it as a basis for any trans healthcare is also inherently flawed. Also outside of a couple extremely anti-trans articles in the guardian is there ever a non right wing
@tv_large @nicolajayneh @DadRogd Lisa's study on ROGD was presented uncritically in that doc, which is just plain wrong with how many critical flaws it had and how cynical it was of other studies. Litman's study is incredibly flawed by view: https://t.co/
@JuliaMasonMD1 @itsSupercar @arthur_affect @muddlewait @Quibilah1 @mxanthropology @ShieldingC @remembrancermx @BrynnTannehill @jack_turban @KWierso There was no evidence. There was a study that was retracted. But no evidence to support it has come to light
@joaniwalshi No it wasn't. It was torn to shreds by peer review. https://t.co/FDtakQmHOi
@canadiankakashi @sjwdebates @econbrkfst Archives of Sexual Behavior pp 1–6 Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@ToothbrushTed @mimmymum No, pro-reality peer review by other scientists showed that the ROGD study was biased rubbish https://t.co/sPpma6aswO https://t.co/NjPgSzbQwa https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@danny_el_guy @antihero_kate Her "research" was garbage and was shredded at peer-review. There's no credible evidence that ROGD exists. https://t.co/NjPgSzbQwa https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@4th_WaveNow The actual science, like the actual proper peer-review process, is what has determined that there's no such thing as ROGD https://t.co/NXEuPrIMpZ https://t.co/NjPgSzbQwa https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@MascaraAmanita @solardyke @carrionthrash Yes, though even calling it "basic" is rather generous - the authors had to make major corrections and the journal issued an apology... https://t.co/B9a2On3y8j
@DadRogd ROGD doesn't exist. https://t.co/B9a2On3y8j
@kvinnopakten @hanne_kjoller Du vet redan detta, men eftersom du befinner dig på samma intellektuella nivå som Sverigedemokrater, som obstinat fortsätter klökas desinformation trots att motsatsen bevisats flera gånger om. Skärp er och sluta förtrycka tra
@profjmb Ah yes. The academic literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior pp 1–6 Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” https://t.co/XOArAaG8GO https://t.co/xhdB8nj5wb
@mrbenjaminlaw @Bernard_Lane In addition to @mrbenjaminlaw's link: https://t.co/YUUXBtoSI8
@swannieriv @mopseytoes @joshgnosis @callapilla @thetimes @guardian Littman is a fraud https://t.co/MmnR3sV3Rf
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @learnincurve11: This whole thread about a GC “academic”’s paper bring utterly trashed is amazing but this stands out https://t.co/H21P…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @learnincurve11: This whole thread about a GC “academic”’s paper bring utterly trashed is amazing but this stands out https://t.co/H21P…
RT @learnincurve11: This whole thread about a GC “academic”’s paper bring utterly trashed is amazing but this stands out https://t.co/H21P…
RT @learnincurve11: This whole thread about a GC “academic”’s paper bring utterly trashed is amazing but this stands out https://t.co/H21P…
...which links to this methodological critique: https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @learnincurve11: This whole thread about a GC “academic”’s paper bring utterly trashed is amazing but this stands out https://t.co/H21P…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
RT @quollhorreur: And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by som…
And, hilariously, it’s now become an example of how not to methodologise: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc And it was done by someone at Littmans. Own. University. Awkward.
@june_atwood @thekylie_show @H_L_Smith_ @ChrissieSeeB Again, Quillette. Really? Allllllllll these corrections had to be made for PLOSONe to even consider republishing. And now held up as an example of poor methodology: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc https://
@june_atwood @thekylie_show @H_L_Smith_ @ChrissieSeeB Wow, how to rewrite history there, mate. This is why she was summirarily panned for shut methodology and unsubstantiated claims. https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc
@june_atwood @thekylie_show @H_L_Smith_ @ChrissieSeeB Nope, she wasn’t, which is why all these corrections had to be made to the paper when it was peer reviewed. It’s why her methodology is help up as a “don’t do this”: https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc https://t.
@june_atwood @thekylie_show @H_L_Smith_ @ChrissieSeeB Where did I quote Julia Serrano, sunshine? Nice strawman though. https://t.co/xTLk3YIlCc
@june_atwood @thekylie_show @H_L_Smith_ @ChrissieSeeB Littman doesn’t stand up at all. To the point that: 1. Major corrections made to the PLOSONe paper due to misrepresentation. 2. It’s literally become the new lesson in crap methodology: https://t.c
@CrispSandwich4 @KirinDave @hackinginquiry @IpsoNews @CCriadoPerez See this rebuttal of Littman’s original study for some perspective as to why one might reject the author’s methodology: https://t.co/zLPHp6Rs5W
@PsychRabble Hi - have you seen this already? A critique of Littman's paper. Any comment? https://t.co/4uphgTxO6a
@Dust_PNG Also to be verified, in some form at least, there'd have to be more studies, certainly ones methodologically more robust than Littm/an's https://t.co/4vdA2TOj1Q
@BuckAngel If you prefer more academic links, I encourage you to read Arjee Restar's peer-reviewed article (unfortunately mine won't be out for a bit longer): https://t.co/91vooIaYki
@SatuRuna @aSciEnthusiast "Studied" in the sense of one discredited, shockingly biased paper, which was initially published without peer review. https://t.co/I7RgNcWT1t
@wants_blue @BobWithers52 ROGD is a condition made up by transphobes - they really don't want trans kids to be able to transition, largely because they can't generally spot trans people who transitioned in childhood. https://t.co/v5F7kYDlJf
@wants_blue @BryterLayter1 @suequinnaziz @BobWithers52 Ah, the Littman paper. You better read this: https://t.co/v5F7kYDlJf
@BobWithers52 ROGD? Have you read this: https://t.co/v5F7kYDlJf
RT briandavidearp: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” | SpringerLink https://t.co/zcy0CMTUYE
Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” | SpringerLink https://t.co/TaUUrY665P