@dilanesper @ChronicBabak @tdverstynen @jessesingal She specifically surveyed only parents who posted on anti-trans websites! If you think that's a representative sample, you're wrong. Do you know anything about social science research? https://t.co/sCOE0W
@BretteDutton https://t.co/T3DLbqG3BI Your social contagion bullshit is wrong and based on a false study with bad research. You are a failure of a parent and what every person wishes they don’t end up as.
@ColinHnyzher @VeteranGamerUK @chilijellybeans https://t.co/Y4lyjhSXnS Here’s a really good review with a lot of the things wrong with her methodology, and issues with the general design of the study. Littman seems to have clear a priori bias, invites pos
@TheAKSdog You might enjoy this article: https://t.co/lFlDof5X8e
@tpwk47 @Devorum @JoshFro00029538 @SwipeWright I'm fairly certain the study you're referring to was critiqued by authors in the field who also think social contagion isn't a viable explanation. And there's earlier work also questioning it (e.g., https://t.
RT @Sucko02: y otro criticando el estudio de Littman L., 2018 por tener una metodología deficiente (plantea la hipótesis de la existencia d…
y otro criticando el estudio de Littman L., 2018 por tener una metodología deficiente (plantea la hipótesis de la existencia del ROGD como fenómeno clinico) de Restar AJ., 2020. https://t.co/yVfUOF2pBD https://t.co/4RADSpgsBb
@awesomely_mike @BostonChildrens Good Video Examining the ROGD Study https://t.co/kuvo4FiajY Critique of Study: https://t.co/mspX7LCNK1 Critique of Detrans Studies (the study it links isn’t adress, because it’s an analysis of the individual studies used
@electedbread @BostonChildrens The sources they cite are bullcrap. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria is a myth and the study it originated from is junk science https://t.co/mspX7LCNK1 Also the study regarding surgery leading to higher suicide is miscited beca
@McMarsmcclure @_Be_not_Afraid @MForstater @pittparents Even before this study, "ROGD" wasn't considered credible, for a number of reasons (e.g., https://t.co/VAvt32bRtt, https://t.co/phSGGzkyYg, https://t.co/3eQCvJptGt). ...
@B_for_backup @FuxxFell https://t.co/UtE92bA03u Bad Science
RT @ElleLettMDPhD: The original article had to be so thoroughly corrected the credibility was trashed . And @Dr_ArjeeRestar and @ButNotTheC…
How Rapid Onset Gender Disphoria was discredited academically
@LongBaIILarry @MattWalshBlog @JesseKellyDC No problem, honey, you do seem a little bit slow on the uptake. 😉 https://t.co/cJ7Hg8lXml
RT @caitlinmoriah: or this one!! https://t.co/z5Bh162Ags https://t.co/LAT8NcdTj6
or this one!! https://t.co/z5Bh162Ags https://t.co/LAT8NcdTj6
The original article had to be so thoroughly corrected the credibility was trashed . And @Dr_ArjeeRestar and @ButNotTheCity published high quality criticism that ended the study . See them here : https://t.co/frEge9o3ov and https://t.co/6IQm7fJWKs
@JennieFr3derick @nathanoseroff You do know that Littman's ROGD study is largely seen as bunk, right? https://t.co/Ky27vhXYLl
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
Also, the Littman ROGD study was not good science. https://t.co/Ky27vhXYLl
@ledoublepreis @missdelein2 @el_nagashi hier https://t.co/4FBggzZQ81 und https://t.co/wewtDWbsbk und Litman musste zähne knirschend einräumen https://t.co/HOBfNXJdp0
@epa_nit @EverydayisWedn3 @florianklenk Meine Güte. 🙄 https://t.co/qb0JMaOAxM
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @MaskHate: @herong @Valkskorn I am also surprised that she is seemingly unaware of this study: https://t.co/8mnxQ8kR4s It found no supp…
@herong @Valkskorn I am also surprised that she is seemingly unaware of this study: https://t.co/8mnxQ8kR4s It found no support for ROGD when looking at actual patient data (as opposed to an anonymous priming self-selecting internet survey that explicitly
@anodynedreams @Valkskorn @jasonintrator @everydayangst1 It's unsurprising that Littman's internet survey did not match real world data since it was severely flawed (selection bias, priming ahead of start etc) She explicitly allowed 1 person to retake it
@GumMental @Janedoeordont @UNIGEnews @Blick_fr @LisaLittman1 @nytimes Pour info, la critique de cette étude est à trouver ici: https://t.co/5s8UzJ7idX
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Restar, A. J. (2020). https://t.co/hlWqxd6DeP 50/
RT @pandovstrochnis: Pour une critique approfondie de la méthodologie de cet article : https://t.co/PbamDwfs4j
Peer reviewed critique of the paper. https://t.co/frEge9o3ov
@JohnDSailer I however did explain the paper and here is one of several peer reviewed responses to the paper https://t.co/l87Eb28xB5. Also please note that littman herself had to revise the paper after it was heavily criticized by scientists which you negl
@Arkilogos @PolitiFact and this https://t.co/G04eYhPwFb
@TheMoominmama @eilidhdouglas Litman ROGD "study" was already shown to be parent's opinions on their child, not the actual child's presentation. https://t.co/COE551LqQA
@ShannonBDouglas @riverglimmer @WistfulOtter You're right, that which never existed in the first place doesn't ever go away. The initial study has glaring methodological errors to the point that the initial author's conclusion was not merely incorrect, bu
Y aquí dejo una crítica a la metodología del estudio original de Littman https://t.co/ZyErYjW4z2
Tun so als wären sie ideologiefrei, zitieren eine Organisation die Transitionen von unter 25 Jährigen verbieten möchten und der Britische Gründer sehr negativ mit Morddrohungen auffiell. Bzgl. 'ROGD' gibt es natürlich Studien! Methodologische Kritik: htt
@SwipeWright @TulikaBose_ @gp_jls @FondOfBeetles @WSJ Her paper was so bad it needed immediate re-review, and the revisions didn't change the core problems. Of course you'd still think it was legitimate. As for the rest, I'll get to it. As it turns out, I
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
@kevinMFtallica @ukguy4 @SuddenlyPigeons @wbtourlondon And lastly she parrots a bogus study supporting a conspiracy theory about people being pressured into becoming trans The study is extremely biased and was conducted by interviewing parents of trans ch
@lecanardnoir @ETVPod No she did not, and it is strange to assert that she did. https://t.co/kSGUGHZTG6
@SendHel61275067 @SuddenlyPigeons @KeySituation @diequalder @OrwellNGoode 2. She is spreading a very biased study which fearmongers about trans people being tricked into being trans. The methodological issues are explained excellently here: https://t.c
@Petite_Core @flitur L'étude de Littman, c'est de la merde. https://t.co/JsMHaG80DP
@jordanbpeterson @Esqueer_ People aren’t criticising Shrier for daring to tell the truth. They’re criticising her because she based her entire book on a severely flawed study. And neither you nor Rogan had the courage (or even understanding) to ask her a
@DearLeftyFriend @michaelshermer For starters, off the top of my head: https://t.co/OSsNWSoS40 https://t.co/Tc7oOthDXD
@pandoraswelt @SaSchuBln @Mama_arbeitet Dann gibt es noch diese Studie, die sich klinisch verwertbare Daten von Trans Jugendlichen ansieht und guckt ob ROGD passend ist: https://t.co/4IZN3dnfgu Und natürlich der Klassiker der methodologischen Kritik des R
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
@phamnuwen2 @KatyMontgomerie @StefanZ92021648 @heterodorx I doubt it, see https://t.co/4IZN3dnfgu, and here: https://t.co/UtE92bA03u
@GadSaad @jk_rowling Rowling based her argument on fraudulent and discredited research. She argued that ‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ has a scientific basis. It does not. (See below). Her arguments are baseless. And, therefore, transphobic. https://t.c
@jordanbpeterson Rowling based her argument on fraudulent and discredited research. She argued that ‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ has a scientific basis. It does not. (See below). Her arguments are baseless. And, therefore, transphobic. https://t.co/jx
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
RT @RamonNogueras: Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA…
Y esta es la crítica metodológica al estudio original de Littman, donde se inventa el concepto de DGIR. ESTÁ HASTA EN LA WIKIPEDIA https://t.co/A5k2cHihpg