↓ Skip to main content

Analogue Gravity

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 107)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
509 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Analogue Gravity
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, December 2005
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2005-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Barceló, Stefano Liberati, Matt Visser

Abstract

Analogue models of (and for) gravity have a long and distinguished history dating back to the earliest years of general relativity. In this review article we will discuss the history, aims, results, and future prospects for the various analogue models. We start the discussion by presenting a particularly simple example of an analogue model, before exploring the rich history and complex tapestry of models discussed in the literature. The last decade in particular has seen a remarkable and sustained development of analogue gravity ideas, leading to some hundreds of published articles, a workshop, two books, and this review article. Future prospects for the analogue gravity programme also look promising, both on the experimental front (where technology is rapidly advancing) and on the theoretical front (where variants of analogue models can be used as a springboard for radical attacks on the problem of quantum gravity).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
France 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 37 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 49%
Researcher 8 17%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 38 81%
Mathematics 5 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#634,260
of 13,516,269 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#11
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,389
of 210,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them