↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a cross-sectional observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a cross-sectional observational study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13613-017-0263-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Witteveen, Juultje Sommers, Luuk Wieske, Jonne Doorduin, Nens van Alfen, Marcus J. Schultz, Ivo N. van Schaik, Janneke Horn, Camiel Verhamme

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 18 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#9,203,664
of 14,624,189 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#469
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,357
of 264,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,624,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them