↓ Skip to main content

Responses of the radial growth of the endangered species Keteleeria fortunei to climate change in southeastern China

Overview of attention for article published in Trees: Structure & Function, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Responses of the radial growth of the endangered species Keteleeria fortunei to climate change in southeastern China
Published in
Trees: Structure & Function, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00468-019-01839-0
Authors

Zheng Zhao, Keyan Fang, Chunfu Cao, Dai Chen, Xiaoyue Liang, Zhipeng Dong, Peng Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,681,211
of 13,429,401 outputs
Outputs from Trees: Structure & Function
#200
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,941
of 254,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees: Structure & Function
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,429,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.